Pergam Falcon vs SeekerOne vs Sensirion: Aerial Methane Sensors Compared

Pergam Falcon, SeekerOne and Sensirion-class sensors detect drone-borne methane by different physics — stand-off TDLAS laser, compact laser, and miniature point module. How the three compare for aerial leak detection, and which fits screening.

Published 2026-07-14 · UAV Imaging Inc.

Key takeaways

“Which methane sensor should fly on the drone?” usually comes down to three names buyers keep hearing: the Pergam Falcon, the SeekerOne, and small gas modules from Sensirion. They are not interchangeable — each sits on a different point of the range-versus-weight-versus-quantification trade-off. This compares the three head-to-head for aerial leak detection, then explains which one UAV Imaging flies and why. (Exact specifications differ by model and revision; confirm current figures with each manufacturer.)

Pergam Falcon — stand-off TDLAS laser

The Pergam Falcon uses Tunable Diode Laser Absorption Spectroscopy (TDLAS): it fires a laser tuned to a wavelength methane absorbs and measures how much of the reflected beam returns. Because it integrates along the whole beam path, it reports a quantified path-integrated concentration in parts-per-million-metre (ppm-m). It is the sensor UAV Imaging flies on the Matrice 300 RTK.

SeekerOne — compact drone laser sensor

SeekerOne is positioned as a compact, drone-mounted laser methane sensor — the same broad laser-absorption family as the Falcon, packaged smaller and lighter for lift-limited aircraft. That packaging is the point of difference: a lighter sensor is easier to fly on smaller platforms, generally at the cost of some range, robustness or quantification depth versus a larger stand-off instrument.

Sensirion-class — miniature point gas modules

Sensirion makes miniature gas-sensor modules — small, low-cost MEMS-based elements used across many gas-sensing products. Integrated onto a drone, a point module of this class samples the air that physically reaches the sensor rather than measuring along a beam to a distant target.

Head-to-head

AttributePergam FalconSeekerOneSensirion-class module
Sensing methodTDLAS laser (stand-off)Compact laserMiniature point module
ReadingPath-integrated ppm-mLaser concentration (model-dependent)Air-at-sensor concentration
Fly through plume?No — stand-offReduced / short-rangeYes — required
Relative weightHeavier instrumentLightLightest
Relative costHigherMidLowest
Best-fit jobFast screening of long linesSensing on small aircraftClose-in confirmation

Comparison is by sensor approach; the SeekerOne and Sensirion columns describe the sensor class, not verified model specifications. Confirm current figures with each manufacturer before specifying.

Which one UAV Imaging flies, and why

Most Alberta gas-co-op and producer work is a coverage problem first: kilometres of gathering and distribution line that are slow and hazardous to walk. Of the three, the Pergam Falcon fits that best — a quantified, stand-off reading that covers far more ground per hour than a ground crew without flying the aircraft into the plume, producing a geo-tagged survey track for the audit file. A SeekerOne-class sensor makes sense when payload forces a smaller aircraft; a Sensirion-class point module suits close-in confirmation, not wide-area screening. UAV Imaging screens with the Falcon on the Matrice 300 RTK, and the H20T's radiometric thermal can confirm a visible plume once a location is flagged.

The honest limit on all three

No airborne sensor — Falcon, SeekerOne or Sensirion module — replaces the ground walkdown a regulatory framework such as Alberta's Directive 060 relies on to classify a leak and drive repair. Aerial detection is the fast, cost-effective screening layer that tells a crew where to walk. UAV Imaging positions it exactly as screening, paired with a Method 21 (or equivalent) ground step.

Frequently Asked Questions

How do the Pergam Falcon, SeekerOne and Sensirion methane sensors differ?
They sit on different points of the range-versus-weight trade-off. The Pergam Falcon is a stand-off TDLAS laser that reports path-integrated ppm-m and screens long lines without entering the plume. SeekerOne is a compact drone laser sensor packaged lighter for smaller aircraft. Sensirion-class modules are miniature point sensors that read only the air reaching them, so the drone must fly through the gas.
Which of the three is best for screening long gathering lines?
The Pergam Falcon. Its stand-off TDLAS method gives a quantified reading and covers far more line per hour than a ground crew, without flying the aircraft into the plume. SeekerOne-class sensors fit weight-limited small aircraft, and Sensirion-class point modules are better for close-in confirmation than wide-area screening.
Are the SeekerOne and Sensirion specifications in this comparison verified?
No. The comparison describes each by sensor class and approach, not by verified model specifications, because exact figures vary by model and revision. Confirm current specs with each manufacturer before specifying a sensor. UAV Imaging's own equipment is the Pergam Falcon.
Can a drone methane survey satisfy a regulatory leak program on its own?
No, regardless of sensor. Aerial detection is a screening layer. Regulatory frameworks such as Alberta's Directive 060 rely on a ground walkdown (for example Method 21) to classify a confirmed leak and drive repair. UAV Imaging positions aerial survey as fast screening that directs the ground crew, not as a replacement for it.
Book a commercial drone flightMapping, inspection, multispectral and thermal across Alberta.Request a quote →or call 587-532-9000