Case Study: Finding an Underperforming String by Drone Thermal

A representative walkthrough of how a drone radiometric thermal scan isolates an underperforming solar string that inverter data alone flags only as a vague production dip. Method, deliverables and outcome.

Published 2026-07-14 · UAV Imaging Inc.

At a glance

This is a representative walkthrough of UAV Imaging's solar thermal inspection methodology, drawn from how these jobs are run in the field rather than a single named client. It illustrates what the deliverable looks like and why aerial thermal finds what string-level monitoring alone misses.

The problem: a production dip with no address

Utility-scale arrays are monitored at the inverter or combiner level. That is enough to tell an operator that production is a percent or two below model — but on an array of tens of thousands of modules, “down 2%” is a symptom without a location. Sending a crew to walk every row with a handheld meter is slow and, in the meantime, the array keeps underproducing. The question the operator actually needs answered is: which modules, and how bad?

The method: every-module radiometric thermal

A defective module runs hotter than its healthy neighbours because energy that should be leaving as electricity is dissipated as heat. Radiometric thermal imaging makes that temperature difference measurable from the air. The flight:

What the scan found

The array-wide production dip resolved into a pattern: a run of modules along one string reading consistently warmer than the surrounding array — the thermal signature of a string carrying a fault rather than a scatter of unrelated single-module defects. Instead of “the array is down 2%,” the operator now had a specific string, a location on the site map, and a severity ranking for each affected module.

The deliverable

Why aerial thermal earns its place

Inverter data tells you that something is wrong; an every-module thermal scan tells you where and how bad. For a utility-scale operator, closing that gap quickly is the difference between weeks of quiet underproduction and a same-week targeted repair. One flight covers an array that would take days to walk, and the severity-ranked output means the crew fixes the modules that actually move production first.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is this case study based on a specific client?
It is a representative walkthrough of UAV Imaging's solar thermal inspection methodology, drawn from how these jobs are run rather than a single named client's data. It is written to show what the deliverable looks like and why aerial thermal localizes losses that string-level monitoring only flags in aggregate.
Why can't the inverter data alone find the bad modules?
Inverter- and combiner-level monitoring tells an operator that production is below model, but on an array of tens of thousands of modules it cannot point to which ones. Radiometric thermal imaging measures the temperature difference of faulty modules directly, turning an array-wide percentage into a specific, mapped defect list.
What conditions do you need to fly a solar thermal scan?
High irradiance — clear sky with the sun high — so healthy and faulty modules separate cleanly on temperature. Overcast conditions suppress the thermal signal and are avoided. The scan is flown at a consistent altitude and angle so readings across the array are comparable.
What do we get at the end of a solar thermal inspection?
A geo-referenced thermal orthomosaic, a defect list keyed to module and string location and classified by anomaly type and severity, representative thermal/visual image pairs, and a prioritized action list the O&M crew can dispatch against.
Book a commercial drone flightMapping, inspection, multispectral and thermal across Alberta.Request a quote →or call 587-532-9000